The Sage of Persuasion: Part III

[Organ music swelling] Last time on Sage of Persuasion:

Trivia: One artist who has capitalized off tying his music to particular brands is the artist Moby. Apparently, creativity runs in his family. Which famous author is he related to?

Answer: Herman Melville, author of Moby Dick

A Sense of Persuasion

We’d all like to think we don’t let our senses or emotions lead us into purchasing decisions, but we’d be fooling ourselves if we thought we made cold, calculated decisions 100 per cent of the time. Our senses contribute largely to the decisions we make on a daily basis. Think about it – ever gone grocery shopping when you’re hungry? Has a smell ever transported you back to a particular time and place? And these sensory experiences don’t just contribute to a particular purchase decision. They can solidify our lifelong relationship with a particular brand of shoe or soda. As O’Reilly sums it up “brands aren’t about what you know; they’re about what you feel.” A successful brand forges a relationship with a person and assails all their senses – akin to a romantic “wooing”, complete with chocolates, flowers, and walks in the park. One such example of a full-on sensory branding was Singapore Airlines. They chose not to compete on USP, but on an experience and creating a serene feeling, carefully constructed with attention to details from infusing a special fragrance into stewardesses’ uniforms and hot towels, to the carefully scripted captain’s announcements.

From the sublime to the ridiculous, the sensory experiences continue with sound tests for the “SNAP, CRACKLE, POP-ability” of Rice Krispies in a Danish laboratory, to coating the underside of seats in new Rolls Royce with a fragrance more in keeping with the older models, to Mercedes Benz devoting an entire department to the sound the door makes when it closes, it seems that marketers will stop at nothing to ensure we are persuaded on every level of our being.

687675-lg_coca_cola_classic_bottle_superAnd as much as I ridicule some of these things, I can’t say I’m immune. For example, try to convince me that Coke tastes the same in a can as it does in a bottle and I’ll disagree with you til the cows come home. This particular emotional attachment has lead to many a disagreement in the grocery store aisles. No Adam, it’s not about the cost of the Coke – it’s about the experience. And Terry O’ Reilly agrees with me.

The Face of Persuasion

My eyes opened even wider than usual with a glimpse of the words “Nova Scotia” on page 208. It turns out that the Fuller Brush Man – Alfred C. Fuller – the millionaire of song and legend, was born in our charming province. Fuller inherently knew what many suspected – to have a successful business, you must invest in people. He felt good salespeople were the best advertising money could buy. He was obviously on to something there; his small company grew to reap 1 million per year in 1919 and went on to make $109 million in 1960. Our province could use a few more like him these days.

As a Masters Tournament begins that even non-golfers will be glued to, O’Reilly drops a bombshell. Apparently, there was a time when it was not the norm for celebrities to hawk wares or to tie their personal brand with a particular product. In this day and age, where the face and/or behind of the newest teen sensation graces every advertisement in magazines and television, it’s a very difficult fact to swallow. Even more difficult to swallow than the fact that Tiger slept with that homely Jamie Grubbs. Obviously, tying your brand to a celebrity can have disastrous consequences. To which O’Reilly discusses the consequences of going with a cartoon icon (i.e., they can’t cheat on their spouses with tattooed creatures). He also examines some disastrous “reinventions” of dead celebrities, including some hilarious examples like Colonel Saunders and Orville Redenbacher (or Deadenbacher as he came to be known).

The Long and The Short of It

Taking budgetary considerations out of the equation, when deciding to advertise, brands need to make the determination as to whether brevity or length are going to persuade their audience. In the case of the Master Lock Company of Milwaukee, they went with the former. In the case of the U.S. School of Music, they opted for the latter.

O’Reilly harkens back to a time when storytelling, be it in brief but powerful headlines and visuals, or lengthy scripts a la Ogilvy ruled the day. Ads that were very effective both from a persuasion perspective and from a historically relevant perspective include Lemon, Avis, and Rolls Royce. Unfortunately, O’Reilly concludes, the art of storytelling in advertising is going the way of the dodo bird. He references some compelling television ads, one which I was familiar with and one I was not – Fly Fishing by J.R. Hartley and the Canadian equivalent of this ad – Canadian Tire’s “Bicycle”.

While storytelling in the classical sense may be going by the wayside, there has been an upsurge in the trend of “behind the scenes” storytelling. “The Making Of”, camera A and camera B on television shoots, DVD extras, can be major selling points. I’ve had my own experience with this in attending live satellite shows at Park Lane for the Metropolitan Opera, wherein between the acts, they break down the “4th wall” and actually show the behind the scenes action of the set changes and talk to the cast members. Admittedly, it took me a little while to get used to this, but now that I am, I feel it adds another level to the performances and the MET brand.

The Wall of Cynicism

imageshuskersO’Reilly closes his book with historical examples of con men, advertising gone awry and a sober second thought. The bad press and slang terms often associated with the advertising industry (i.e., hucksters) did not appear out of thin air. They originated with the snake oil salesman and have been continued by purveyors of shady products that promise everything and deliver next to nothing. As the old adage goes “nothing makes a bad product fail faster than a great ad”. It’s a rallying cry for those in the industry to remember that at the core of it all, we must have an inherent set of values that we adhere to, not only to achieve our end goals, but to persuade people we’re not all bad. In summary, we must, “Do this or Die”.

Share this:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • RSS

5 Responses to “The Sage of Persuasion: Part III”

  1. This is a very cool observation Erin. Good for you. keep on blogging. M.

  2. LOOK HOW EAGERLY FOLKS AWAIT THE COMMERCIALS FOR THE SUPERBOWL. MY FAVOURITE ADS HAVE TO BE THE A&W ADS. THEY ARE SOOO FUNNY I LOVE THEM. YOU HAVE TO OUTSMART PEOPLE INTO REMEMBERING THE ADS WHEN THEY ARE PURCHASING PRODUCTS AND IN A LOT OF CASES, IT WORKS. THANK YOU FOR THE GREAT ARTICLE ERIN.

  3. Very well written.

    Your reference to the airline is a great example of scent branding – I have had the pleasure of scenting spaces and working with similar companies and those who truly understand the multi levels to a brand – understand an appreciate this branding,

  4. While reading your blog I recalled 2 experiences that occurred during my days with the McCain marketing department in the 70s. The first was a decision we had to make concerning Anne Murray. Our agency of the day was making a big play to have us sign a multiyear contract with her and CBC whereby we would dominate the timeslots within her TV specials. Big bucks, tremendous reach once a month. But we were selling frozen french fries that were purchased almost weekly by our core consumers, so frequency of advertising had to be considered. Frequency won out and we passed on Anne Murray even though we felt we had undermined her career aspirations somehow. She eventually proved she didn’t need our “cold comfort”!

    The second involved the introduction of McCain Super Fries and the positioning ‘battle’ that took place between our marketing department and the agency’s creative team. This potato product was processed in a special way that enhanced the crispiness of finished fries as they came from kitchen oven. From consumer research we knew that users of conventional products found them to be inferior to those prepared in restaurants by deep frying. The objective was to increase the growth of the overall retail frozen french fry market even though we knew we were going to steal from the sale of existing products. The creative team wanted to introduce the product as a new improved McCain frozen french fry — which it was, but we felt that the consumer research gave us a wonderful opportunity to tell a bit of a story; “deep-fried flavor and crispness without deep frying” — which involved shooting a commercial of a restaurant diner the owner of which was cooking fabulous fries in a conventional oven to his amazed customers.

    I’m currently reading Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Tipping Point” and I think it should be mandatory reading for anybody in the advertising — public-relations business. Chapter 3; The Stickiness Factor contains some of the most intuitive insights I’ve ever read about what appeals to children watching television. And I suggest the findings could easily be conveyed as to what appeals to adults.

  5. well written blog, Erin!
    my favorite part, of course, was the bit about the disagreement in the grocer aisle.
    I’m with you on the bottle of coke versus can; Pepsi is still the soda that rocks my socks, though.
    Definitely think I’d be able to win a taste test.

    Funny, I was just mentioning to you Sunday about how we get emotionally attached to certain items, or brands, in life.
    An adult woman crying over parting with a mickey mouse tee shirt…. WTF?!
    Feeling guilty about tossing a Mexx blazer never worn…. yeesh!!

    C ( a.k.a. Flea )

Leave a Reply